Hello! I read your blog every day! I just had some questions for you. Will you please blog about this? I live in a muggle neighborhood. My muggle neighbors asked me to go to a "Vomie" with them. So I did. But it was Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. We all know the story of that. It only showed half of the story. But that is not my question. My question is about how they had different people being the characters in the story. Why couldn't they just use the real people? It is someone called Daniel Radcliffe that plays Harry. Why couldn't they just use Harry? It seems like that would make much more sense. AND HIS EYES WERE BLUE! What's up with that?
Signed,
Bertty Nome
Dear Bertty,
Really? I would think it was easier to, but, who understands Muggles? If it was a documentary of Harry ages 11-17, (I have heard of the "Vomies" and Books) then they couldn't "flilm" Harry in between his adventures. If they had "flilmed" after the adventures were over, then 11 year old Harry would have been 36-43 when they "flilmed." It just would have been weird. And the Green to Blue eyes, I have no answer. Hmm... Was I in the "vomie?" In Harry's fifth-seventh year, I played a big part! I hope I was in there...
Love,
Luna
How YOU can ask YOUR questions:
ReplyDelete*Click the square picture of me up near the corner.
*Click "Send a Message"
*Write your question!
Do NOT use your real name, or your location. Remember to sign with an alias(fake name).
Tell me if you really do want this question publicly answered. If not, please mention you don't want me to blog about your question. If your question makes it through our screening test, you may be answered! You WILL be answered, of course, just maybe not publicly. Check back often to see if I answered your question!